Do you agree with the Department of Health and Social Care's decision to end the Think Ahead scheme?
- Yes, fast-track courses are costly and do not adequately prepare trainees for the complexities of social work. (50%, 291 Votes)
- No, Think Ahead is vital in training and recruiting mental health practitioners. (50%, 289 Votes)
Total Voters: 580
Loading ...A fast-track scheme for training social workers will end in 2027 after the government decided to withdraw funding on financial grounds.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) will not renew charity Think Ahead’s contract to deliver its scheme to train people to work as adult mental health social workers, which began in 2016.
This means that the 2025 cohort, due to start with Think Ahead this summer, will be the last to complete the two-year programme, under which participants qualify after year one, supported by a bursary of £18,250 to £20,250 and no tuition fees.
DHSC ‘reviewing investment in social work’
The DHSC’s decision is based on what it sees as the relatively high cost of training a Think Ahead participant, in the context of the current pressures on the public finances.
A department spokesperson said: “Mental health social workers provide an invaluable service, and they are critical to a thriving healthcare system.
“We inherited appalling economic circumstances and are reviewing how we invest in social work so we can ensure the best use of taxpayers’ money to help people as effectively as possible.
“This government is committed to ensuring we have the right professionals in the right places with the right skills to give people the care they deserve.”
The decision, which saves about £9m a year, is the DHSC’s second cut to investment in social work training since Labour came to power in 2024, following its cancellation of the second round of its Conservative predecessor’s social work apprenticeships programme.
Think Ahead ‘hugely disappointed’
The news comes just weeks after Think Ahead launched a campaign urging the DHSC to invest in 24,000 more mental health social worker roles in the NHS over the next decade, to add to the existing almost 4,000 full-time equivalent posts.
“We’re hugely disappointed,” said Think Ahead chief executive Philippa Mariani. “We absolutely believe that mental health social work should be prioritised in workforce planning and we’re worried that, without a secure pipeline of mental health social workers going into the sector, there will be an impact on teams, on service user experience and on service user outcomes as well.”
She said that employers, participants and stakeholders had expressed “great sadness” at the DHSC’s decision to end funding for the scheme, which currently trains about 160 people a year.
Programme ‘makes a huge difference on the ground’
A 2019 evaluation of the scheme concluded it offered a “robust preparation” for mental health social work for its participants, most of whom became “valued recruits” for the employers they were placed with.
Mariani said: “We’ve got a very successful programme and we’re hugely oversubscribed – we’ve got 90 applications for every place we have. We know there’s a big appetite for this and we know that it makes a huge difference on the ground. Eighty per cent of our partners say that their trainees make a difference to their teams within a very few months of joining.”
She said the programme’s key benefits were its focus on training people in social work “through a mental health lens” and the speed with which it could “bring committed people who are wanting to develop careers in mental health to the front line”.
“Being able to rapidly bring that new resource to the workforce in a way that’s really focused around the needs not only of the people who receive services but also the workforce development needs of the providers themselves is what makes it very very different to everything else that is on offer.”
However, she added: “We’re now in a time of real financial constraint and I think that is where this is coming from.”
About the Think Ahead programme
- The two-year programme trains people to become adult mental health social workers within a year.
- It has three elements:
- a five-week “summer institute” to provide a grounding in mental health, social work and the law;
- a one-year placement within a unit of trainees managed by a consultant social worker within a local authority or NHS trust, during which the participant does further academic study and qualifies as a social worker;
- a second year employed by the same organisation, during which the person completes a master’s in social work practice and their assessed and supported year in employment (ASYE).
- It is fully funded, to the tune of £9m a year, by the DHSC, which includes financing bursaries of £18,250 (or £20,250 in London), tuition fees and placement costs in year one.
- The scheme is open to graduates with at least a 2.2 (previously a 2.1) in a subject other than social work.
- The academic component has been delivered by Middlesex University since 2019.
- The programme trained its first cohort in 2016, when 95 joined the scheme, with cohorts of about 100 until 2020, and then of about 160 since 2021.
‘Need to maintain pipeline of mental health social workers’
In response to the news, social care and mental health organisations stressed the importance of training sufficient mental health social workers.
“With the number of people needing support for mental illness increasing, it’s vital we maintain a good pipeline of new social workers specialising in this area,” said Association of Directors of Adult Social Services president Jess McGregor.
“Recruitment and retention of social workers remains challenging, so it’s important we review all the different routes into social work to ensure we develop a strong, stable and diverse adult social care workforce.”
For charity the Centre for Mental Health, chief executive Andy Bell said: “We urgently need more mental health social workers in England. Social work is an essential part of mental health care.
“Social workers help people to live independently, assert their rights, and build the lives they want. It is vital that sufficient training is in place to sustain and expand the workforce in the years to come.”
The response from PSWs
The chairs of the Adult Principal Social Worker Network said there had been some very good experiences of Think Ahead in local authorities and NHS trusts”.
“Most employers have had to look at strategies to train and retain social workers in recent years and Think Ahead played a part of that work in many areas.
“Hopefully effective elements of Think Ahead’s work can be incorporated in the new Master’s apprenticeship route so that graduates can still have access to a quicker route into qualification and progression.”
This is a reference to the introduction of social work apprenticeships for people who already have a degree, which can be completed in less than the three years allocated to undergraduate apprenticeships.
“No changes to 2024 and 2025 cohorts
Mariani said the decision would not affect the 2024 cohort, who are due to qualify later this year before taking up jobs with their placement employer, or 2025 participants, who will start the programme in the summer.
“The funding for those cohorts is there, there’s no threat to that at all. We will be continuing, business as usual, to deliver those cohorts. There will be no impact to people currently on our programme or about to start it.”
According to its latest report, Think Ahead received £9m for the fast-track programme from the DHSC in 2023-24, 97% of its total income, with £234,000 from other sources for consultancy projects.
Think Ahead ‘still committed to mission’
However, Mariani said that, despite the DHSC ending its funding of the organisation, it remained committed to its mission to recruit, train and promote a thriving mental health workforce and would continue with it.
“We’re very much looking to our partners in the NHS, local authorities and the voluntary sector to help us build from this, to build new programmes, new developments, new solutions around workforce so we can continue to fulfil our mission.”
She added: “It’s early days and we haven’t for firm plans that we can talk about as yet. But clearly what we want to do is build on the things we’ve been doing, [including] campaigning for more mental health social workers.
“We want to also make sure that whatever grows out of future activity for Think Ahead, it ensures that the social approach is absolutely embedded in mental health teams.”
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole 
Hampshire County Council 
Oxfordshire County Council 
South Gloucestershire Council 
Wokingham Borough Council 
Embedding learning in social work teams through a multi-agency approach 
The family safeguarding approach: 5 years on 
Harnessing social work values to shape your career pathway 
Webinar: building a practice framework with the influence of practitioner voice 
Workforce Insights – showcasing a selection of the sector’s top recruiters 
Free CPD on Parkinson’s for health and social care staff 
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Instagram
Due to the rise in apprentice social workers there are no jobs for those of ius who paid for our degrees, are qualified to a higher standard than apprentices and couldn’t work due to the degree being full time. I realise it’s not a them or us situation, we need more social workers across the board, however, it is unjust that there are no jobs left for those of us who have worked just as hard for qualifications and have masters degrees. So in my opinion, in this current climate, the withdrawal of funding is a good thing.
I am due to start a Masters in September and it’s worrying there are no jobs ready. I was led to believe on graduation we have a very good chance of a job as its what we are training for. I feel the traditional University route with placement is the best learning method.
Very sorry to hear about your situation Susan. I hope you get a good job opportunity soon. I have just been made redundant from my University teaching post because of declining student numbers. There is nothing wrong with looking at different ways of training social workers, but there should be some proper planning and consideration of the impacts regionally of these different initiatives. As I pointed out my local authority “partners”- If you embrace all these schemes and then end up needing to come back to your local University once all the funding gets pulled then you may find that there is no local University course anymore to provide you with new staff.
I’m in the nhs listing very nice band 5 and 6 roles in somerset mhst that social workers could apply for, an often get very few applicants. So odd to hear there aren’t any jobs-i guess it depends where you live + look?
It’s not cost effective and many leave soon into their career. Bursaries need to be reformed with the money saved.
The fast track schemes rarely work and Think Ahead seems like a very expensive scheme. Those trained through these schemes often don’t stay in Frontline SW or leave the profession altogether as soon as they realize it’s just not for them. There needs to be a whole reset in Social Work….not many people are resilient enough to withstand the very high levels of abuse we see in social work these days. Anything to say Social Work England?!
I think you have misunderstood the programme. While training, people on this programme complete their masters degree.
Fast track programmes and apprenticeship programmes as you point out correctly do lead to Masters awards. However, graduates of these programmes do have an advantage over normal graduates who paid for their degrees because they already have a job and do not have to compete for one. I don’t know how good a course Think Ahead is but the other Fast Track programme Frontline only focusses on child care and is not a generic qualification.
I tend to agree with other comments: Fast Track is likely to be inadequate training and is unlikely to equip social workers to survive in the mental health environment. I managed to stay in Social work for 25 years and it was always hard. It just became harder and harder: fighting for funding for every area. Just train more Social Workers, value them and provide ongoing on-job training and support. When I started there were regular training days (which stimulate and remind one why one is doing the job). In the last five years of my working life the only training I manage to get was a course on getting ready for retirement. People leave Social Work for a reason: it is very hard and many people leave: some before even working.
Personal experience on a similar children and families programme made me realise it does little to prepare people for the job. I qualified via the traditional university route, which was supportive and relevant. However, many LA’s are increasing their apprenticeship places which have higher success rates and reduced staff turnover.
I guess the thing with the apprenticeships is that the student is forced to work for that employer for two to three years, otherwise they have to repay the degree costs. So that is bound to help with retention. It will be interesting to see how many of those apprenticeships students stay on after 3+ years.
I’m in agreement with the traditional University route to social work. I can’t imagine that 2 years of fast-tracking could equate with 3/4 years of hard slog and continual reflection! It’s certainly not value for money when fast tracked social workers are leaving the profession! Perhaps more money should be invested into a proper regulator that will support the profession instead of the palaver that we currently have.
I have been a Social Worker for 21 years and I did the full-time 4 year degree. I have worked in different roles, Child protection, Foster care, adoption and Adult social work. It is very easy to transfer your skills for a new role because the values and principles of SW are the same everywhere. All the employer does is offer you ongoing training for the new role and within 6 months you will be a master of that role. I strongly believe the fast track programs create social workers with less skills and adaptation.
I couldn’t agree more..I have been a social worker for 21 years and still mostly enjoy it.
I have observed that so many fast tracked
social workers very quickly call themselves ‘senior social workers and claw their way towards ‘management’.
Alternatively some seem to love the drama of ‘being in their own film’..The novelty then wears off and surprise, surprise’ recognise they don’t have the capacity to do the job and leave! (After all they haven’t invested financially so what have they got to lose?
I agree there are some candidates who bring valuable experience for different sectors. However I have met several who don’t and my impression is they are taking an opportunity opportunity to ‘do something else’.
Social work should be a vocation. In 21 years, I wonder how many ‘apprentices will still be doing this very important and under valued role?
Bottom line
For the long term families and individuals need committed experienced social workers.
There’s no ‘quick fix’ to any aspect of life. Including becoming an effective social worker.
Your last line sums it up perfectly.
2 years is hardly a ‘quick fix’ when you’re working and studying at the same time. Many come in with serious life experience and a deep sense of purpose. People leave the profession at all levels, and just because they didn’t take the ‘traditional’ route doesn’t mean they’re less committed?? Some of us choose this path knowing it’s tough, underpaid, and often undervalued…. Because we care. Instead of sneering at new social workers and putting people down, maybe try mentoring them.
I think the apprenticeship is a much better route as the candidates have previous experience – unlike majority of Think Ahead students
Also the programme employs lots of staff – but v few with MH and/or SW experience and they don’t deliver the programme !
I support the principle behind fast-track programmes like Think Ahead — they’ve brought passionate, capable individuals into the profession who may not have entered otherwise. But a mixed economy of routes is essential.
In my experience, being involved since 2026, Think Ahead can prepare people well for frontline mental health practice if employers invest meaningfully in their development over the two-year period. You get out what you put in. Where there’s strong local support, structured supervision, and a focus on integration into team culture, these practitioners thrive. Where that’s missing, the model falls short.
The real issue isn’t one route versus another — it’s the fragility of the system they enter. We need better national and local workforce planning, investment in post-qualifying support, and parity of esteem across all entry routes. That’s the conversation we should be having
I have read all these comments. What a mess. Did no one consider how it would affect the different groups? So, anyone who’s paid thousands for their degree will have a less qualification than someone who’s only been doing social work for two years. They say they want to make expert mental health social workers but the first year of the BA is mostly mental health and development. And as for the Tutor who has now been made redundant, was there really no foresight?
I’m so glad to be out of social services after 20 years. I still work as a social worker but privately. And accepting 3% pay rise , when we have always been on similar wages to teachers, and their’s have shot up, seems awful and yet the survey suggests most people would be happy with it.
Good. Fewer gravy train subsidised schemes we have the better the public will be served. Set two tier training and privileged job market, benefit from it but not the profession than you deserve being obliterated.
I qualified back in 2002 with what was then the DIPSW. It’s not necessarily the sort of course or how fast (DIPSW was 2 years) It’s down to the commitment to the job. I have always worked in a mental health team and was an ASW/AMHP for 17 years. I’m now a Specialist Forensic Social Worker, Band 6 NHS. It’s hard work and you have to cope with a lot of stress and changes. Plus it’s not just about “your career” you have to be able to work with people across the board who are often distressed, making poor choices and dealing with the impact of that.
I did support a front line student through her “adult care bit”. She gave me the impression that she saw the fast track into social work as a fast track to higher salaries and senior management. When really that isn’t the case at all. Let’s just go back to how we have always done it ….
I agree with you Deborah, I had similar experience with Think ahead practice education where I found students aren’t necessarily practice ready but full of confidence as they become selected through the different stages of Think ahead program.
I just wanted to come at this from the angle of someone who will be directly impacted by this. I was successful in gaining a place on Think Ahead back in November. Unfortunately, I was informed that my placement has been deferred because they couldn’t find a Local Authority or NHS Trust in my area.
Since graduating in 2017 with a social sciences degree, I’ve worked continuously in mental health services. I’ve worked closely alongside social workers, mental health teams, and other professionals. I’ve worked hard to progress, but without being a registered professional, I’ve hit a wall in terms of career progression. This programme felt like the only viable route for me to gain registration financially, logistically, and in terms of building on the experience I already have. Think Ahead stood out because it paid for the qualification while providing a salary, making it accessible for people like me who can’t afford to stop working to study full-time.
I’ve seen a lot of negative comments about Think Ahead, and while I understand the concerns about fast-track routes and the state of the profession more generally, I think it’s important to acknowledge the nuance. Not everyone on this route is inexperienced or using it as a ‘shortcut’. Some of us have been working in the system for years and are deeply committed to social work values. We’re just seeking a way to gain registration without going into debt or having to step out of the workforce.
Yes, the system needs more regulation and investment. Yes, retention and working conditions need urgent attention. But attacking alternative routes like Think Ahead, especially when they open doors for people already embedded in the field feels misdirected.
I am so sorry to hear about your situation Jay. I am coming to the end of my first year as part of the 2024 cohort and similar to yourself I have worked in mental health services for years before applying to Think Ahead. This type of course was the best way for me to seek to gain registration whilst doing the best for my family. It has not been an easy ride but it is something I am determined to make work.
It has been difficult to read some of the negative comments around Think Ahead, fast track courses and the perceived quality of my training and skills I will come out with upon completion. The way you have stood up and spoken for yourself and others in your situation is very admirable.
I really hope you are able to find an alternative way to get your registration as I fear we may miss out on a number of potentially great Social Workers like yourself if different avenues of qualification are closed off.
In my experience (x4) the Think Ahead route has been a great success . Practitioners are really motivated, have on the ground experience and work extremely hard. They bring a wealth of knowledge, have established local knowledge and an understanding of how services function. Their training might be only two years as compared with the 3 yr university degree courses, however it is full on. I think it’s an excellent route into social work. I am really sorry to read that it won’t be continued. I hope this decision will be reconsidered.
It is a great shame that those who trained via the university route are unable to find work. Perhaps dependent on geographical location. There are many routes into work, I am surprised this is an issue.
I am really sorry to hear Think Ahead is coming to an end. I am coming to the end of my first year and social work is not something I really considered however I absolutely love it. I would not have been able to fund myself financially through a traditional degree, and Think Ahead has given me the opportunity to find a career I have a passion for.
I am sorry to see that this won’t be an option going forward. Yes there are budget cuts everywhere at the moment, but I feel that there is a need for mental health social workers.
I appreciate the range of opinions shared about the Think Ahead programme, but I feel it’s important to challenge some of the assumptions and conclusions being drawn.
Firstly, it’s unfair to assert that fast-track programmes inherently result in less competent social workers. In my experience, having worked closely with Think Ahead graduates, I have seen firsthand how they bring fresh energy, commitment, and valuable skills to mental health services. Many of these practitioners are thriving and are highly regarded within their teams. They did not take a shortcut; they worked intensively over two years, balancing academic rigor with on-the-ground practice in highly demanding environments.
The criticism that these routes undermine traditional university pathways also lacks nuance. It’s not a case of one being better than the other. Both routes serve different purposes and audiences. Think Ahead opens doors for talented individuals who might not be able to afford a traditional degree pathway, particularly those who are already embedded in the mental health field and looking to formalize their registration without stepping away from work.
Instead of fostering division between different training routes, we should focus on workforce challenges that affect everyone in the sector — such as retention, career progression, and ensuring parity of esteem across different qualification routes. The real problem is not how social workers are trained, but the lack of structured, supportive career pathways after qualification and the often challenging conditions they face.
Let’s not overlook the impact these comments might have on current Think Ahead trainees and graduates. They are people who have chosen social work because they care about making a difference. Negative and divisive statements can be disheartening and unfairly devalue their commitment and hard work.
As social work leaders, we should be focusing on how to attract, retain, and support the next generation of social workers — not pitting one training route against another. A diverse workforce, with varied entry points and training experiences, ultimately enriches the profession and benefits the people we serve.
Let’s use this moment to come together, advocate for better workforce planning, and support all our colleagues, regardless of how they entered the field.
Thank you for standing up for the programme. I totally agree that both traditionally trained Social Workers and Think Ahead trained Social Workers need to work well together. I am a service user who works with Think Ahead what we all want is the best possible Social Workers to work with people who have the misfortune of bad mental health.
But the real problem is how social workers are trained. Flawed training, inadequate teaching, no real time preparation for practice is the bedrock of good social work. How you prepare your future staff to cope with the realities of practice and the politics of practice is also how you retain your staff. Social workers face negative narratives all day and every day so to suggest comments here might impact the confidence of trainees is actually very concerning. If discussion between fellow professionals undermines your committment then I would suggest that might be a very good moment to appraise whether the real life travails of social work is suited to your welfare. Fragility we all have, resilience we may lack often but we understand reality, that’s why we turn up for day each day. When did having differences of opinion expressed openly become putting one against the other? Social work isn’t one narrative, it’s not one choreographed head nodding certainty. Or at least it didn’t used to be.
Bedrock of “Bad” social work. Apologies for the typo.
Thank you; as a service user involved with Think Ahead since the beginning your reply is really uplifting and just the attitude we have hoped to see embedded through the programme.