Councils face £500m adult social care overspend in 2020-21 as Covid fuels mounting need

    Needs relating to abuse and neglect, carer breakdown and hospital discharge deepening as pandemic progresses, say directors in last-ditch bid for government cash

    Coins, notes and calculator
    Photo: spectrumblue/Fotolia

    Story updated

    Councils face an adult social care overspend of £468m this year as Covid-19 has triggered deepeening needs relating to safeguarding, domestic abuse, carer breakdown and hospital discharge, directors have warned.

    In a last-ditch bid for cash from this week’s government spending review, the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services released a survey report today which found that the billions provided to support adult social care through the pandemic was not sufficient.

    Based on completed responses from two-thirds of England’s adult directors in late October and early November, the survey found that needs had increased in key areas – and risks to care services had worsened – since similar research conducted in May.

    Off the back of the report, ADASS has urged government to find an extra £2.15bn to see councils through the rest of the financial year – up from the £1.7bn the association calculated was needed earlier this month – and significant additional funding for 2021-22.

    Chancellor Rishi Sunak will set out the government’s plans for 2021-22, including the level of resource targeted at local authorities, in this Wednesday’s spending review.

    ‘Wake-up call’

    So far, the government has provided councils with £4.6bn in un-ringfenced funding to battle Covid-19, with £1.4bn of the first £3.2bn of this spent on adult social care. In addition, ministers have provided £1.15bn specifically to control infection in adult care services while £1.9bn has also been provided to the NHS to support people’s discharge from hospital, much of which will have been spent on social care.

    However, on the back of its latest survey, ADASS president James Bullion said: “This should be a wake-up call for the government, and it must respond. The risk is that unless adult social care is prioritised in the spending review, the caring arrangements that millions of us rely upon will break down and the cost will the paid by society and the economy.

    “This is an opportunity to send a clear signal that working-age disabled people, older people and carers are recognised, valued, and protected. Failure to invest now will also make the goal of long-term reform so much harder to achieve.”

    Respondents to the survey projected they were on track to overspend their budgets by £3m on average by the end of the 2020-21 financial year which, scaled up, would represent a national overspend of £468m.

    However, ADASS warned: “This figure is likely to be subject to significant change given that we are on the cusp on winter and the impact of this on services and budgets is as yet unclear.”

    Deepening need

    The latest survey provides an update on the position facing councils since ADASS last surveyed directors on the financial impact of Covid, and in key areas the position has got worse.

    The biggest area in which needs had increased since the onset of pandemic was in relation to people discharged from hospital, for which half of directors said that needs had increased by at least 10%, up from a third who said so in the May survey. Overall, 70% said needs had risen in this area, up from 55% in the May poll.

    The proportion of senior leaders saying that safeguarding and domestic abuse needs had risen by at least 10% has doubled since the May survey, from about 20% to 40%, with 69% overall reporting increased needs, up from 42%.

    In May, 35% of directors said needs in this area had fallen since the pandemic, with only 8% saying this was the case now, which ADASS attributed to the lockdown hiding safeguarding concerns.

    There was also a significant rise, from 41% to 63%, in the proportion of directors reporting increased community referrals, for example as a result of personal assistant breakdown or people having to shield.

    Needs arising from carer breakdown, sickness or unavailability were also up, from 53% in May to 64% in the latest survey.

    Commenting on this rise, ADASS said both the numbers of people providing unpaid care, and the intensity of such care had increased during the pandemic, adding: “In many cases, if an unpaid carer falls sick, there may be no one else available, or capable, or providing the care and support that their family member or friend requires. In such cases it is often adult social care who provide emergency support to the people they are caring for.”

    Legal compliance risk

    In addition, 23% of directors said they had no confidence that their budgets would be sufficient to meet all of their statutory duties, with the same proportion saying they were fully confident they would do so.

    This represents a better position than in May, when 35% reported no confidence and 4% full confidence, though since that previous survey, the government has allocated £1.4bn in un-ringfenced cash, £546m through the infection control fund and £588m to fund post-discharge care.

    Other trends reflect the lifting of restrictions during the summer and early autumn, with a fall from 80% to 65% in the proportion of directors reporting increased need because of providers’ concerns around accepting new clients. There was also a drop, from 74% to 66%, in the proportion reporting increased need from temporary closure of services, such as day centres.

    Care market concerns

    However, the survey also revealed significant concerns about the state of the care market. Forty one per cent reported care home providers closing or ceasing trading in their area, from May to October 2020, up from 25% for the period covering October 2019 to March 2020, with an increase in 15% to 22% in relation to home care providers over the same time.

    Almost all directors said they were concerned about the financial sustainability of at least some of their area’s care home providers, with one in five saying they were concerned about most or all of them. In relation to home or community care providers, 88% were concerned about the sustainability of some (78%), most (7%) or all (3%) of them.

    Directors also projected a rise of 4.64%, from £17.64 to £18.49, in the hourly cost of home care between 2020-21 and 2021-22, which it said would “only add further pressure to already stretched local authority budgets unless fully funded by government”.

    Spending review demands

    ADASS reiterated its call for the government to find an extra £1.2bn to provide breaks for unpaid carers, plus £480m for home and community care to deal with the pandemic-induced shift away from residential services, for the rest of the 2020-21 financial year.

    It said this should be supplemented by the £468m to fill the projected black hole in councils’ budgets this year.

    In relation to the spending review, which will cover 2021-22, it said the government needed to fully fund the ongoing and legacy costs of Covid-19, including to cover safeguarding and domestic abuse-related needs and the increasing proportion of people having care at home.

    In addition, it called for an extra £1.3bn to cover demographic and inflationary pressures in adult social care in 2021-22, while urging ministers to ensure other local government services are protected to safeguard adult care from additional pressures.

    4 Responses to Councils face £500m adult social care overspend in 2020-21 as Covid fuels mounting need

    1. Saddened November 23, 2020 at 8:37 pm #

      Being a hospital social worker this year has been horrendous, it’s quite simply not social work. We need stronger leaders who will stand up for the individuals we work with who are being shunted anywhere and every where for the sake of ‘saving the NHS’. People deconditioning in care homes because theres not the staff to follow up after dis charge as they’re onto the next person. Saddens me.

      • Experto Crede November 27, 2020 at 6:51 am #

        As a family at the end of social workers decisions to give 2 hrs notice to remove loved ones to care homes hundreds miles away, we ask at what point, if any, would you have said say no?

        Our loved one of working age, STILL dumped and not having even seen a social worker was put in to a covid environment and the discharging hospital knew this. All rehab stopped. Conditions have worsened.

        Other options were not even considered despite the risks ( and he being in a high risk group). Not even a DOLs in place. Just horrendous. Could have put in home care support but chose not to consider this. Refused us ( as NHS relatives with full understanding) to temp take home with carers. Saod they had already made the decision without consulting him or us who had seen him daily for 6 mnths.

        So instead isolated, depressed, care home bans visits and we had to cite case law to get him out for day visits the few times we have been. We dont drive.

        9 months on where was the exit plan?
        STILL no plan, just dumped to die are his words.
        He needs a care package at home except social workers who placed saying they dont see clients face to face to assess, despite the fact they safely cpuld.
        So no one assesses.

        We had direct access to the NHS directive. To discharge pts in to danger was wrong and all knew that it was wrong.

        Did any social workers say no?
        Any?

    2. Chris Sterry November 24, 2020 at 8:45 pm #

      This is far from, unexpected, for COVID-19 has made an already very serious crisis in Social Care into an extremely very serious crisis in Social Care.

      In fact, if the Government does not solve to funding crisis in Social Care the words to describe the crisis will not be there, as the crisis will be too extreme to describe.

      The long road the social care ‘can’ is being kicked down is coming or has come to a ‘cul-de-sac’ from which there is no escape, except the required funding.

      If the funding is not forthcoming then there is a serious risk of a total failure to social care, which, in turn will escalate safeguarding concerns, causing extremely serious consequences for people in need of care and their families.

      COVID-19 is not the main cause, as this is the serious lack of funding.

      The Government needs to act and act now, for to not do so shows they are not abiding by their ‘Duty of Care’.

      I have felt so strongly on this, that I created the petition, Solve the crisis in Social Care,

      https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/solve-the-crisis-in-social-care

      Should you wish to see more then please see,

      https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2MsYduiazgoFWfvanmXBW23hDj?e=jEAVEb

    Trackbacks/Pingbacks

    1. Social care faces overspend - Kit4Carers - November 24, 2020

      […] Councils face an adult social care overspend of £468m this year as Covid-19 has triggered deepening needs relating to safeguarding, domestic abuse, carer breakdown and hospital discharge, directors have warned Community care […]